Lade ShotBOT und genieße die App auf deinem iPhone, iPad und iPod touch. Is this a concern at all when cutting pink foam, or is the material so soft that you can run bits as deep as they will go? Does either shallow or deep cuts contribute to heat build-up in the cutting head? I'm using a relatively low-torque router on a shopbot gantry, if that matters. Lies Rezensionen, vergleiche Kundenbewertungen, sieh dir Screenshots an und erfahre mehr über ShotBOT.
Does anyone here have good experience cutting pink foam, and can help clarify this? I'm having touble knowing who to trust on this. People advocating this approach seem to be mostly worried about finish surface, and don't mention melting as a problem, despite the higher flute count. Other people seem to be recommending using four-fluted endmills, running at high rpms (15-20k) and moving between 6 and 10 ips.
The target base is portable and 4 to 6 fit inside an automobile for easy transportation to your firearms training site. A wireless, hand-held remote control activates timed or random target sequences instantly. People advocating this approach generally warn about melting onto the bit, hence the low speeds and high feed rate. The Shot Bot is a Lightweight, Flexible and Affordable target system, designed for a wide range of dynamic firearms training scenarios. Some people are saying to use two-fluted upcutting bits (either standard helixes, or special foam cutting bits), at very very low rpms (5-8k), and feed rates around 6 ips. From what I've read, I seem to be hearing two (seemingly contradictory) approaches. I've actually done a fair amount of reading on this, both on this forum and on others, and have gotten some seemingly contradictory information.īasically, I'm wondering about appropriate tools, feeds, and speeds, for machining pink insulation foam. First of all, my apologies for asking a question that has been asked a million times before on a variety of different forums.